Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Justin's avatar

So well said, my friend! We have run into this situation many times: we are handed a "completed" space, and then we are supposed to be off to the races to make it function, only to find all the spatial issues.

To the general public reading this - THIS is why we started Precursor Hospitality - to work with owners/developers and the design team, including the architect of record, to avoid the trap of prioritizing beauty over function. Our goal is to identify and address any potential design issues that conflict with the day-to-day realities of operating a space.

FORM + FUNCTION = harmonious space

And of course, there are the financial implications of not getting this correct, right out of the gate. According to a large AIA analysis of 18,229 completed U.S. building projects, change orders increased project cost by an average of approximately 3.2%–5.04%, depending on project size. However, the upper boundary of the “typical” middle 80% of projects was approximately 13%–16%, meaning a 10%+ result is not remotely unusual.

10%+ on average!?

For example, on a project with $30 million in hard construction costs:

Controlled project at 5%: $1.5 million total change-order exposure

Typical hospitality allowance at 7.5%: $2.25 million

Fast-track or poorly coordinated project at 10%: $3 million

That is the total cumulative exposure, not the expected cost of one change.

Not to mention the potential loss of revenue due to staff frustrations (the cost of recruiting, hiring, and training), non-optimized traffic patterns (meaning more time between tasks), inventory controls... It goes on and on, like having a leak in your plumbing, the operation slowly (or quickly) misses out on revenue.

The cheapest time to solve an operational problem is before it is built. The most expensive time is after opening, when every correction disrupts staff, guests, and revenue.

That is why operators need a seat at the table early—not after the space is “finished.” Our role is to pressure-test the design against the realities of daily operations and ensure the property performs as well as it photographs.

Because hospitality is not a rendering. It is a living, working operation.

The Upgrade | Anne Marie's avatar

This is so true. I worked housekeeping during some summers, and my mom created the housekeeping handbook for our company. Chains are a bit easier to standardize than independent properties with such ops conversations, but now housekeeping is one of my biggest areas of judgement for hotel. A room turned after 11 am shows me they have a staffing issue.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?